Hi again, Friday Follies fun-atics! Today the Grammar Cop has several wrong-word infractions to show you, as part of her efforts in language-crime prevention.
- MONTREAL TIMES: “This is a film that may interest people who like literature and those who want to know about the life of this reclusive author which until now continues to be one of the most celebrated American authors of all times.”
- MONTREAL TIMES: “[He] leaked essential information which ultimately implicated then-President Richard Nixon to the Watergate fiasco.”
- MONTREALGAZETTE.COM: “The nomadic company has travelled across Canada and around the globe, setting up site-specific shows, but its principle, longtime venue was the Bain St-Michel in the Plateau before it was closed indefinitely for renovations in 2015.”
The corrections:
- It might be easier to ask: What is right in this sentence? First of all, it’s horrendously long. The writer seems to think that the more clauses he can cram into one sentence, the better. (It contains no less than five!) But the mistake that jumped out at me when I first read it was the word “which.” It should be who, as in: …who until now continues to be… The reason is that the word who refers back to the “reclusive author.” An antecedent that is a person must take the pronoun who. (The pronoun “which” refers to a thing.) As my favourite online dictionary states: “Who: used to introduce a clause giving further information about a person or people previously mentioned.” Before I go, Mr. Writer of this Piece, please, please, next time break it up into two or three sentences. I also strongly suggest you re-read what you’ve written afterword, aloud if possible; it will help prevent the repetition of words such as: author/authors.
- You don’t implicate someone to something; you implicate them in something. So it should say “…implicated then-President Richard Nixon in the Watergate fiasco.” (The writer may have been thinking of to as in “linking to … the fiasco.”)
- The adjective needed here is principal, not “principle.” The latter is never an adjective. So the wording should be: …its principal longtime venue was… Notice I omitted the comma after principal; it’s not necessary.
I sincerely hope that the principal grammar errors implicated in the above selections will not be perpetrated by any of my loyal FF readers. Stick with me, Follies followers! 😀
I’m sticking, Ellie. I’m sticking. The mistakes you list often make my eyeballs stumble, but I like being reminded to stay on the highroad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh Anne, yes yes, do stay… but on the sidewalk, not on the road!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Keep it up! I here about these mitsakes all the time, their to much! Your on the right track.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL! And sew are yew!!!
LikeLike
1-The film will definitely not interest writers who know about grammar and who will be laughing rather loudly as they eat their popcorn which is an American snack often eaten at the cinema. (I hope he reads this out loud several times!)
2-Apparently Nixon, who claimed not to be a crook, was linked to the Watergate scandal as well as being in it up to his eyebrows.
3-The show was closed and they were all sent to the principal’s office.
😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hot *damn* girl, you’re funny! 😂😂😁😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
I look forward to this every week! It’s so much fun! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
And your comments are always hilarious! Keep ’em comin’!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I caught myself glancing ahead, to see if the sentence was ever scheduled to end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know, right? It’s exhausting!
LikeLike